Head-to-Head Analysis

Thin Spaghetti vs Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Thin Spaghetti

Thin Spaghetti

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt

Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
21.4g
12.5g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thin Spaghetti and Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thin Spaghetti is the clear winner. With 107 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Thin Spaghetti contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Thin Spaghetti offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thin Spaghetti or Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Thin Spaghetti has 357 calories, while Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thin Spaghetti vegan?

No, Thin Spaghetti is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thin Spaghetti and Kettle Cooked Potato Chips Original with Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.