Head-to-Head Analysis

Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers vs Organic Walnut Halves

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers

Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Walnut Halves

Organic Walnut Halves

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
414 kcal
Energy
667 kcal
13.8g
Sugars
3.3g
12.1g
Fat
66.7g
6.9g
Protein
16.7g
1.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers and Organic Walnut Halves side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers is the clear winner. With 253 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers contains significantly more sugar (13.8g) compared to the milder Organic Walnut Halves (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Walnut Halves is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers or Organic Walnut Halves?

It depends on your goals. Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers has 414 calories, while Organic Walnut Halves has 667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers vegan?

No, Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thin Wheat Reduced Fat Crackers and Organic Walnut Halves?

There is a difference of 253 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.