Head-to-Head Analysis

Thins Integral vs Limited edition despicible me minion bundle

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Thins Integral

Thins Integral

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Limited edition despicible me minion bundle

Limited edition despicible me minion bundle

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
283 kcal
Energy
3.9 kcal
5.4g
Sugars
0g
2g
Fat
0g
11.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Thins Integral and Limited edition despicible me minion bundle side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Thins Integral is the more energy-dense option here, packing 279 more calories per 100g than Limited edition despicible me minion bundle. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Thins Integral contains significantly more sugar (5.43g) compared to the milder Limited edition despicible me minion bundle (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Limited edition despicible me minion bundle is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Thins Integral offers a protein boost with 11.7g per 100g, outperforming Limited edition despicible me minion bundle in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Thins Integral or Limited edition despicible me minion bundle?

It depends on your goals. Thins Integral has 283 calories, while Limited edition despicible me minion bundle has 3.8775510204082 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Thins Integral vegan?

No, Thins Integral is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Thins Integral and Limited edition despicible me minion bundle?

There is a difference of 279 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.