Head-to-Head Analysis

Three Wishes Cotton Candy vs Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Three Wishes Cotton Candy

Three Wishes Cotton Candy

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms

Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
371 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
8.6g
Sugars
63.3g
4.3g
Fat
0g
22.9g
Protein
3.3g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Three Wishes Cotton Candy and Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Three Wishes Cotton Candy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 38 more calories per 100g than Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Three Wishes Cotton Candy takes the lead with only 8.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms contains 63.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Three Wishes Cotton Candy offers a protein boost with 22.9g per 100g, outperforming Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Three Wishes Cotton Candy or Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms?

It depends on your goals. Three Wishes Cotton Candy has 371 calories, while Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Three Wishes Cotton Candy vegan?

No, Three Wishes Cotton Candy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Three Wishes Cotton Candy and Original Gummi Factory Sour Gummi Worms?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.