Head-to-Head Analysis

Tilapia Skinless Fillets vs Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tilapia Skinless Fillets

Tilapia Skinless Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat

Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
88 kcal
Energy
118 kcal
0g
Sugars
4.7g
1.3g
Fat
1.2g
18.6g
Protein
21.2g
0.1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tilapia Skinless Fillets and Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tilapia Skinless Fillets is the clear winner. With 30 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Tilapia Skinless Fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat contains 4.71g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tilapia Skinless Fillets or Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat?

Tilapia Skinless Fillets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Tilapia Skinless Fillets vegan?

No, Tilapia Skinless Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tilapia Skinless Fillets and Wild Caught Tuna Sweet Heat?

There is a difference of 30 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.