Tilapia Skinless Fillets vs Murry's fish sticks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Tilapia Skinless Fillets
Murry's fish sticks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Tilapia Skinless Fillets and Murry's fish sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Tilapia Skinless Fillets is the clear winner. With 146 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Tilapia Skinless Fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Murry's fish sticks contains 1.1904761904762g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Tilapia Skinless Fillets offers a protein boost with 17.8571g per 100g, outperforming Murry's fish sticks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Tilapia Skinless Fillets or Murry's fish sticks?
Tilapia Skinless Fillets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Tilapia Skinless Fillets vegan?
No, Tilapia Skinless Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Tilapia Skinless Fillets and Murry's fish sticks?
There is a difference of 146 calories per 100g between the two products.
