Head-to-Head Analysis

Tillamook Pepper Jack vs Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tillamook Pepper Jack

Tillamook Pepper Jack

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana

Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
392.9 kcal
Energy
82.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
11.2g
32.1g
Fat
0.9g
21.4g
Protein
2.9g
1.9g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tillamook Pepper Jack and Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tillamook Pepper Jack is the more energy-dense option here, packing 310 more calories per 100g than Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Tillamook Pepper Jack takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana contains 11.2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Tillamook Pepper Jack offers a protein boost with 21.428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tillamook Pepper Jack or Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana?

It depends on your goals. Tillamook Pepper Jack has 392.85714285714 calories, while Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana has 82.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tillamook Pepper Jack vegan?

No, Tillamook Pepper Jack is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tillamook Pepper Jack and Original low fat yogurt strawberry banana?

There is a difference of 310 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.