Head-to-Head Analysis

Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers vs Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers

Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size

Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
512 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
11.6g
Sugars
78.6g
25.6g
Fat
0g
11.6g
Protein
0g
1.9g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers and Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 155 more calories per 100g than Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers takes the lead with only 11.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size contains 78.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers offers a protein boost with 11.6g per 100g, outperforming Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers or Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size?

It depends on your goals. Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers has 512 calories, while Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers vegan?

No, Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Toast Chee Sandwich Crackers and Sour Patch Kids Watermelon Treat Size?

There is a difference of 155 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.