Tom Bumble vs Fishnacks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Tom Bumble
Fishnacks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Tom Bumble and Fishnacks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Tom Bumble is the more energy-dense option here, packing 500 more calories per 100g than Fishnacks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Tom Bumble contains significantly more sugar (47.1g) compared to the milder Fishnacks (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Fishnacks is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Tom Bumble offers a protein boost with 11.8g per 100g, outperforming Fishnacks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Tom Bumble or Fishnacks?
It depends on your goals. Tom Bumble has 500 calories, while Fishnacks has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Tom Bumble vegan?
No, Tom Bumble is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Tom Bumble and Fishnacks?
There is a difference of 500 calories per 100g between the two products.
