Head-to-Head Analysis

Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast vs Buttermilk pancake waffle mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast

Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Buttermilk pancake waffle mix

Buttermilk pancake waffle mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
183 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
1.4g
Sugars
8g
7.1g
Fat
20g
23.3g
Protein
3g
0.8g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast and Buttermilk pancake waffle mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast is the clear winner. With 77 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast takes the lead with only 1.41g of sugar per 100g, whereas Buttermilk pancake waffle mix contains 8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast offers a protein boost with 23.3g per 100g, outperforming Buttermilk pancake waffle mix in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast or Buttermilk pancake waffle mix?

Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast vegan?

No, Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tomato Basil Parmesan Stuffed Chicken Breast and Buttermilk pancake waffle mix?

There is a difference of 77 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.