Head-to-Head Analysis

Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes vs Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes

Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
417 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
69.4g
Sugars
0g
12.5g
Fat
25g
0g
Protein
7.1g
11.3g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes and Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes is the clear winner. With 47 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes contains significantly more sugar (69.4g) compared to the milder Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes or Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes has 417 calories, while Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes vegan?

No, Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tomato & Basil Rice Cakes and Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.