Head-to-Head Analysis

Tomato paste vs Kirkland

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tomato paste

Tomato paste

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kirkland

Kirkland

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
90.9 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
12.1g
Sugars
66.7g
0g
Fat
0g
3g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tomato paste and Kirkland side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tomato paste is the clear winner. With 242 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Tomato paste takes the lead with only 12.121212121212g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kirkland contains 66.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Tomato paste offers a protein boost with 3.030303030303g per 100g, outperforming Kirkland in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tomato paste or Kirkland?

Tomato paste appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Tomato paste vegan?

No, Tomato paste is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tomato paste and Kirkland?

There is a difference of 242 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.