Head-to-Head Analysis

Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips vs Fine hollow chocolate bunny

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips

Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fine hollow chocolate bunny

Fine hollow chocolate bunny

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
389 kcal
Energy
150 kcal
5.6g
Sugars
15g
8.3g
Fat
9g
72.2g
Protein
1g
3.3g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips and Fine hollow chocolate bunny side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 239 more calories per 100g than Fine hollow chocolate bunny. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips takes the lead with only 5.56g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fine hollow chocolate bunny contains 15g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips offers a protein boost with 72.2g per 100g, outperforming Fine hollow chocolate bunny in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips or Fine hollow chocolate bunny?

It depends on your goals. Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips has 389 calories, while Fine hollow chocolate bunny has 150 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips vegan?

No, Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tomatoe basil Collagen protein Chips and Fine hollow chocolate bunny?

There is a difference of 239 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.