Head-to-Head Analysis

Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses vs Oat milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses

Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Oat milk

Oat milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
175 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
6g
2.1g
Fat
5g
5.8g
Protein
4g
1.2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses and Oat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses is the more energy-dense option here, packing 175 more calories per 100g than Oat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Oat milk contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses or Oat milk?

It depends on your goals. Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses has 175 calories, while Oat milk has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses vegan?

No, Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses and Oat milk?

There is a difference of 175 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.