Head-to-Head Analysis

Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses vs PROTEIN+ FARFALLE

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses

Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses

Not Vegan
VS
Package of PROTEIN+ FARFALLE

PROTEIN+ FARFALLE

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
175 kcal
Energy
339 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
2.1g
Fat
1.8g
5.8g
Protein
17.9g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses and PROTEIN+ FARFALLE side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses is the clear winner. With 164 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas PROTEIN+ FARFALLE contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses or PROTEIN+ FARFALLE?

Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses vegan?

No, Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tortellini pasta filled with ricotta, mozzarella, and romano cheeses and PROTEIN+ FARFALLE?

There is a difference of 164 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.