Head-to-Head Analysis

Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein vs chocolate chip cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein

Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein

Not Vegan
VS
Package of chocolate chip cookies

chocolate chip cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
469 kcal
Energy
385 kcal
0g
Sugars
30.8g
21.9g
Fat
17.9g
56.2g
Protein
5.1g
2g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein and chocolate chip cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein is the more energy-dense option here, packing 84 more calories per 100g than chocolate chip cookies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas chocolate chip cookies contains 30.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein offers a protein boost with 56.2g per 100g, outperforming chocolate chip cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein or chocolate chip cookies?

It depends on your goals. Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein has 469 calories, while chocolate chip cookies has 385 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein vegan?

No, Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Total Carnivore Chocolate Banana Protein and chocolate chip cookies?

There is a difference of 84 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.