Head-to-Head Analysis

TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED vs Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED

TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies

Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
155 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
6g
Fat
46.4g
25g
Protein
10.7g
0.4g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED and Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED is the clear winner. With 309 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED or Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies?

It depends on your goals. TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED has 155 calories, while Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED vegan?

No, TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between TRADER JOE'S GRASS FED BEEF SIRLOIN ROAST FULLY COOKED & SLICED and Chocolate Chip Mini Cookies?

There is a difference of 309 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.