Head-to-Head Analysis

Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs vs Original Water Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs

Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Water Crackers

Original Water Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
152 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
8.9g
Fat
10g
17g
Protein
6.7g
0.2g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs and Original Water Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs is the clear winner. With 248 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Original Water Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs or Original Water Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs has 152 calories, while Original Water Crackers has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs vegan?

No, Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Trader Joe’s Organic free Range Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs and Original Water Crackers?

There is a difference of 248 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.