Head-to-Head Analysis

Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar vs Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar

Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt

Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
140 kcal
Energy
537 kcal
12g
Sugars
0g
4g
Fat
31.1g
2g
Protein
8.5g
0.2g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar and Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar is the clear winner. With 397 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar contains significantly more sugar (12g) compared to the milder Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar or Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar has 140 calories, while Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt has 537 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar vegan?

No, Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Trader Joe’s PB&J Bar and Avocado Oil Kettle Cooked Canyon Cut Potato Chips - Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 397 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.