Head-to-Head Analysis

Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon vs Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon

Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup

Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
228 kcal
Energy
39 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
8.5g
15.8g
Fat
0g
21.9g
Protein
0g
3.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon and Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 189 more calories per 100g than Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon takes the lead with only 1.75g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup contains 8.45g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon offers a protein boost with 21.9g per 100g, outperforming Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon or Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup?

It depends on your goals. Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon has 228 calories, while Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup has 39 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon vegan?

No, Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Traditional Pure Smoked Salmon and Fruit Cocktail In Extra Light Syrup?

There is a difference of 189 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.