Head-to-Head Analysis

Tri-Color Quinoa vs Featuring wild kratts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tri-Color Quinoa

Tri-Color Quinoa

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Featuring wild kratts

Featuring wild kratts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
378 kcal
Energy
50 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
12.5g
5.6g
Fat
0g
13.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tri-Color Quinoa and Featuring wild kratts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tri-Color Quinoa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 328 more calories per 100g than Featuring wild kratts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Tri-Color Quinoa takes the lead with only 2.22g of sugar per 100g, whereas Featuring wild kratts contains 12.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Tri-Color Quinoa offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Featuring wild kratts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tri-Color Quinoa or Featuring wild kratts?

It depends on your goals. Tri-Color Quinoa has 378 calories, while Featuring wild kratts has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tri-Color Quinoa vegan?

No, Tri-Color Quinoa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tri-Color Quinoa and Featuring wild kratts?

There is a difference of 328 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.