Head-to-Head Analysis

Tropical Paradise Electrolytes vs Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tropical Paradise Electrolytes

Tropical Paradise Electrolytes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great

Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
417 kcal
Energy
280 kcal
83.3g
Sugars
20g
0g
Fat
8g
0g
Protein
32g
0.2g
Salt
4.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tropical Paradise Electrolytes and Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tropical Paradise Electrolytes is the more energy-dense option here, packing 137 more calories per 100g than Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tropical Paradise Electrolytes contains significantly more sugar (83.3g) compared to the milder Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great (20g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tropical Paradise Electrolytes or Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great?

It depends on your goals. Tropical Paradise Electrolytes has 417 calories, while Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great has 280 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tropical Paradise Electrolytes vegan?

No, Tropical Paradise Electrolytes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tropical Paradise Electrolytes and Jack link s beef strips teriyaki count great?

There is a difference of 137 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.