Head-to-Head Analysis

Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp vs Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp

Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss

Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
383 kcal
43.3g
Sugars
1.7g
36.7g
Fat
15g
3.3g
Protein
33.3g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp and Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp is the more energy-dense option here, packing 117 more calories per 100g than Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp contains significantly more sugar (43.33g) compared to the milder Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss (1.67g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp or Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss?

It depends on your goals. Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp has 500 calories, while Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss has 383 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp vegan?

No, Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tru Fru Coconut Melts imp and Almond bliss flavored protein bars, almond bliss?

There is a difference of 117 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.