True to Fruit vs Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
True to Fruit
Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing True to Fruit and Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
True to Fruit is the more energy-dense option here, packing 312 more calories per 100g than Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. True to Fruit contains significantly more sugar (43.8g) compared to the milder Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? True to Fruit offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: True to Fruit or Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings?
It depends on your goals. True to Fruit has 312 calories, while Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is True to Fruit vegan?
No, True to Fruit is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between True to Fruit and Sour Cosmic Gummy Rings?
There is a difference of 312 calories per 100g between the two products.
