Head-to-Head Analysis

Truffle & Sea Salt vs Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Truffle & Sea Salt

Truffle & Sea Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy

Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
450 kcal
0g
Sugars
5g
28.6g
Fat
17.5g
7.1g
Protein
5g
1.4g
Salt
2.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Truffle & Sea Salt and Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Truffle & Sea Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 50 more calories per 100g than Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Truffle & Sea Salt takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Truffle & Sea Salt offers a protein boost with 7.1429g per 100g, outperforming Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Truffle & Sea Salt or Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy?

It depends on your goals. Truffle & Sea Salt has 500 calories, while Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy has 450 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Truffle & Sea Salt vegan?

No, Truffle & Sea Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Truffle & Sea Salt and Pop chips ridges hot buffalo ranch bold & crunchy?

There is a difference of 50 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.