Tuna vs Alaskan Sockeye Salmon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Tuna
Alaskan Sockeye Salmon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Tuna and Alaskan Sockeye Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 115 more calories per 100g than Alaskan Sockeye Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Looking to build muscle? Tuna offers a protein boost with 27.4g per 100g, outperforming Alaskan Sockeye Salmon in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Tuna or Alaskan Sockeye Salmon?
It depends on your goals. Tuna has 115 calories, while Alaskan Sockeye Salmon has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Tuna vegan?
No, Tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Tuna and Alaskan Sockeye Salmon?
There is a difference of 115 calories per 100g between the two products.
