Tuna vs AMARETTI - crisp almond cookies
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Tuna
AMARETTI - crisp almond cookies
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Tuna and AMARETTI - crisp almond cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Tuna is the clear winner. With 433 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Tuna takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas AMARETTI - crisp almond cookies contains 66.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Tuna or AMARETTI - crisp almond cookies?
Tuna appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Tuna vegan?
No, Tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Tuna and AMARETTI - crisp almond cookies?
There is a difference of 433 calories per 100g between the two products.
