Head-to-Head Analysis

Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored vs Mackerel in natural oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored

Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mackerel in natural oil

Mackerel in natural oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
108 kcal
Energy
131 kcal
1.4g
Sugars
0g
1.4g
Fat
64g
20.3g
Protein
17g
1.2g
Salt
875g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored and Mackerel in natural oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored is the clear winner. With 23 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored contains significantly more sugar (1.35g) compared to the milder Mackerel in natural oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mackerel in natural oil is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored offers a protein boost with 20.3g per 100g, outperforming Mackerel in natural oil in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored or Mackerel in natural oil?

It depends on your goals. Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored has 108 calories, while Mackerel in natural oil has 131 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored vegan?

No, Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tuna Creations Bacon Ranch Flavored and Mackerel in natural oil?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.