Head-to-Head Analysis

Tuna Mayo Onigiri vs Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tuna Mayo Onigiri

Tuna Mayo Onigiri

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry

Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
226 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
34g
Sugars
0g
7.7g
Fat
0g
4.2g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tuna Mayo Onigiri and Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tuna Mayo Onigiri is the more energy-dense option here, packing 226 more calories per 100g than Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Tuna Mayo Onigiri contains significantly more sugar (34g) compared to the milder Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Tuna Mayo Onigiri offers a protein boost with 4.2g per 100g, outperforming Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tuna Mayo Onigiri or Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry?

It depends on your goals. Tuna Mayo Onigiri has 226 calories, while Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tuna Mayo Onigiri vegan?

No, Tuna Mayo Onigiri is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tuna Mayo Onigiri and Love & Happiness Blood Orange & Raspberry?

There is a difference of 226 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.