Head-to-Head Analysis

Tuna steak in spring water vs Hot | Smoked Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Tuna steak in spring water

Tuna steak in spring water

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hot | Smoked Salmon

Hot | Smoked Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
116 kcal
Energy
214 kcal
0.3g
Sugars
0g
0.5g
Fat
14g
27g
Protein
22g
0.7g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tuna steak in spring water and Hot | Smoked Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Tuna steak in spring water is the clear winner. With 98 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Tuna steak in spring water offers a protein boost with 27g per 100g, outperforming Hot | Smoked Salmon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tuna steak in spring water or Hot | Smoked Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Tuna steak in spring water has 116 calories, while Hot | Smoked Salmon has 214 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tuna steak in spring water vegan?

No, Tuna steak in spring water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tuna steak in spring water and Hot | Smoked Salmon?

There is a difference of 98 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.