Head-to-Head Analysis

Tuna ventresca in olive oil vs Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Tuna ventresca in olive oil

Tuna ventresca in olive oil

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
235 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.4g
14.1g
Fat
2.1g
24.7g
Protein
18.6g
1.8g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Tuna ventresca in olive oil and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Tuna ventresca in olive oil is the more energy-dense option here, packing 135 more calories per 100g than Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Tuna ventresca in olive oil takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper contains 1.43g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Tuna ventresca in olive oil offers a protein boost with 24.7g per 100g, outperforming Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Tuna ventresca in olive oil or Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper?

It depends on your goals. Tuna ventresca in olive oil has 235 calories, while Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Tuna ventresca in olive oil vegan?

No, Tuna ventresca in olive oil is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Tuna ventresca in olive oil and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Lemon Pepper?

There is a difference of 135 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.