Head-to-Head Analysis

Turkey Jerky Teriyaki vs Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Turkey Jerky Teriyaki

Turkey Jerky Teriyaki

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn

Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
135 kcal
39.3g
Sugars
9g
0g
Fat
3g
32.1g
Protein
4g
3.6g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Turkey Jerky Teriyaki and Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Turkey Jerky Teriyaki is the more energy-dense option here, packing 186 more calories per 100g than Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Turkey Jerky Teriyaki contains significantly more sugar (39.3g) compared to the milder Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn (9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Turkey Jerky Teriyaki offers a protein boost with 32.1g per 100g, outperforming Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Turkey Jerky Teriyaki or Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn?

It depends on your goals. Turkey Jerky Teriyaki has 321 calories, while Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn has 135 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Turkey Jerky Teriyaki vegan?

No, Turkey Jerky Teriyaki is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Turkey Jerky Teriyaki and Salted Maple Organic Quinoa Popcorn?

There is a difference of 186 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.