Head-to-Head Analysis

Twirl vs Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Twirl

Twirl

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry

Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
531 kcal
Energy
444 kcal
58g
Sugars
55.6g
29g
Fat
5.6g
7g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Twirl and Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Twirl is the more energy-dense option here, packing 87 more calories per 100g than Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Twirl contains significantly more sugar (58g) compared to the milder Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry (55.56g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Twirl offers a protein boost with 7g per 100g, outperforming Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Twirl or Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry?

It depends on your goals. Twirl has 531 calories, while Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry has 444 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Twirl vegan?

No, Twirl is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Twirl and Assorted Hard Candy, Blackberry, Peach And Strawberry?

There is a difference of 87 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.