Head-to-Head Analysis

Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa vs Mints

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa

Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mints

Mints

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
1.9 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
6.3g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa and Mints side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 373 more calories per 100g than Mints. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Mints in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa or Mints?

It depends on your goals. Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa has 375 calories, while Mints has 1.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa vegan?

No, Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ultra-Thin Rice Squares With Quinoa and Mints?

There is a difference of 373 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.