Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham vs Potato chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham
Potato chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham and Potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham is the clear winner. With 429 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Potato chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham offers a protein boost with 16.1g per 100g, outperforming Potato chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham or Potato chips?
It depends on your goals. Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham has 107 calories, while Potato chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham vegan?
No, Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham and Potato chips?
There is a difference of 429 calories per 100g between the two products.
