Head-to-Head Analysis

Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham vs Turkey Smoked Sausage

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham

Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Turkey Smoked Sausage

Turkey Smoked Sausage

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
179 kcal
5.4g
Sugars
1.8g
4.5g
Fat
10.7g
16.1g
Protein
14.3g
1.7g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham and Turkey Smoked Sausage side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham is the clear winner. With 54 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham contains significantly more sugar (5.3571428571429g) compared to the milder Turkey Smoked Sausage (1.79g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Turkey Smoked Sausage is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham or Turkey Smoked Sausage?

It depends on your goals. Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham has 125 calories, while Turkey Smoked Sausage has 179 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham vegan?

No, Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ultra thin sliced lunchmeat lower sodium honey ham and Turkey Smoked Sausage?

There is a difference of 54 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.