Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vs GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ultra Thin Smoked Ham
GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is the clear winner. With 63 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Ultra Thin Smoked Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ultra Thin Smoked Ham or GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN?
It depends on your goals. Ultra Thin Smoked Ham has 107.14 calories, while GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN has 170 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vegan?
No, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN?
There is a difference of 63 calories per 100g between the two products.
