Head-to-Head Analysis

Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vs Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ultra Thin Smoked Ham

Ultra Thin Smoked Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites

Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107.1 kcal
Energy
143 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
6g
16.1g
Protein
19g
3g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ultra Thin Smoked Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ultra Thin Smoked Ham or Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites?

It depends on your goals. Ultra Thin Smoked Ham has 107.14 calories, while Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites has 143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vegan?

No, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and Lightly Coated Chicken Breast Bites?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.