Head-to-Head Analysis

Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vs Salisbury Steak

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ultra Thin Smoked Ham

Ultra Thin Smoked Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salisbury Steak

Salisbury Steak

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107.1 kcal
Energy
128 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
1.5g
1.8g
Fat
6.3g
16.1g
Protein
5.3g
3g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and Salisbury Steak side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is the clear winner. With 21 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Ultra Thin Smoked Ham offers a protein boost with 16.07g per 100g, outperforming Salisbury Steak in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ultra Thin Smoked Ham or Salisbury Steak?

It depends on your goals. Ultra Thin Smoked Ham has 107.14 calories, while Salisbury Steak has 128 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ultra Thin Smoked Ham vegan?

No, Ultra Thin Smoked Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ultra Thin Smoked Ham and Salisbury Steak?

There is a difference of 21 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.