Head-to-Head Analysis

Uncured Angus Beef Franks vs Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Uncured Angus Beef Franks

Uncured Angus Beef Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy

Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
263.2 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
24.6g
Fat
0g
14g
Protein
0g
2.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Uncured Angus Beef Franks and Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Uncured Angus Beef Franks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 263 more calories per 100g than Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Uncured Angus Beef Franks offers a protein boost with 14.035087719298g per 100g, outperforming Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Uncured Angus Beef Franks or Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy?

It depends on your goals. Uncured Angus Beef Franks has 263.15789473684 calories, while Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Uncured Angus Beef Franks vegan?

No, Uncured Angus Beef Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Uncured Angus Beef Franks and Zero Sugar Tropical Hard Candy?

There is a difference of 263 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.