Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices vs Chili Mac
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices
Chili Mac
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices and Chili Mac side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices is the more energy-dense option here, packing 15 more calories per 100g than Chili Mac. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices takes the lead with only 1.79g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chili Mac contains 3.12g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices offers a protein boost with 16.07g per 100g, outperforming Chili Mac in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices or Chili Mac?
It depends on your goals. Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices has 107 calories, while Chili Mac has 91.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices vegan?
No, Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Uncured black forest ham ultra-thin deli slices and Chili Mac?
There is a difference of 15 calories per 100g between the two products.
