Head-to-Head Analysis

Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices vs Vienna sausage in bbq sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices

Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Vienna sausage in bbq sauce

Vienna sausage in bbq sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
130 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
3g
3.6g
Fat
90g
16.1g
Protein
7g
2.4g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices and Vienna sausage in bbq sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices is the clear winner. With 23 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices takes the lead with only 1.79g of sugar per 100g, whereas Vienna sausage in bbq sauce contains 3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices offers a protein boost with 16.1g per 100g, outperforming Vienna sausage in bbq sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices or Vienna sausage in bbq sauce?

Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices vegan?

No, Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices and Vienna sausage in bbq sauce?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.