Head-to-Head Analysis

Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir vs Moo Tubes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir

Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Moo Tubes

Moo Tubes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
58.3 kcal
Energy
89.3 kcal
8.3g
Sugars
14.3g
0.8g
Fat
1.8g
4.6g
Protein
3.6g
0.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir and Moo Tubes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir is the clear winner. With 31 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir takes the lead with only 8.3333333333333g of sugar per 100g, whereas Moo Tubes contains 14.285714285714g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir or Moo Tubes?

Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir vegan?

No, Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Unsweetened Prostokvasha Cultured Lowfat Kefir and Moo Tubes?

There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.