Head-to-Head Analysis

USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS vs Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS

USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted

Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
212 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
15g
Fat
10.7g
18.5g
Protein
10.7g
0g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS and Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS is the clear winner. With 217 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS offers a protein boost with 18.5g per 100g, outperforming Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS or Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted?

USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS vegan?

No, USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between USDA STYLE BEEF CHUCK COUNTRY STYLE RIB BONELESS and Pretzel Rounds Sea Salted?

There is a difference of 217 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.