Head-to-Head Analysis

Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend vs 100% Pumpkin

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend

Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of 100% Pumpkin

100% Pumpkin

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
127 kcal
Energy
33 kcal
6g
Sugars
3.3g
7.3g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0.8g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend and 100% Pumpkin side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend is the more energy-dense option here, packing 94 more calories per 100g than 100% Pumpkin. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend contains significantly more sugar (6g) compared to the milder 100% Pumpkin (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 100% Pumpkin is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming 100% Pumpkin in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend or 100% Pumpkin?

It depends on your goals. Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend has 127 calories, while 100% Pumpkin has 33 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend vegan?

No, Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend and 100% Pumpkin?

There is a difference of 94 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.