Head-to-Head Analysis

Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice vs Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice

Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda

Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
127 kcal
Energy
210 kcal
3.9g
Sugars
1.7g
2.8g
Fat
13.4g
2.8g
Protein
14.3g
0.6g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice and Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice is the clear winner. With 83 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice contains significantly more sugar (3.89g) compared to the milder Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda (1.68g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice or Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda?

It depends on your goals. Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice has 127 calories, while Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda has 210 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice vegan?

No, Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Vegetable Biryani with Tumeric Rice and Sous Vide Egg Bites Uncured Bacon & Gouda?

There is a difference of 83 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.