Head-to-Head Analysis

Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro vs belVita Crunchy Toasted Coconut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro

Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro

Not Vegan
VS
Package of belVita Crunchy Toasted Coconut

belVita Crunchy Toasted Coconut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
460 kcal
0g
Sugars
22g
0g
Fat
18g
0g
Protein
6g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro and belVita Crunchy Toasted Coconut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro is the clear winner. With 460 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas belVita Crunchy Toasted Coconut contains 22g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro or belVita Crunchy Toasted Coconut?

Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro vegan?

No, Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Vegetable Root Chips Sweet Potato, Cassava & Taro and belVita Crunchy Toasted Coconut?

There is a difference of 460 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.