Head-to-Head Analysis

Vermont Maple Syrup vs Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Vermont Maple Syrup

Vermont Maple Syrup

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag

Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
80g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
35.7g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Vermont Maple Syrup and Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Vermont Maple Syrup is the clear winner. With 204 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Vermont Maple Syrup contains significantly more sugar (80g) compared to the milder Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Vermont Maple Syrup or Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag?

It depends on your goals. Vermont Maple Syrup has 367 calories, while Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Vermont Maple Syrup vegan?

No, Vermont Maple Syrup is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Vermont Maple Syrup and Ruffles Original Party Size Potato Chips 13.5 Ounce Plastic Bag?

There is a difference of 204 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.