Head-to-Head Analysis

VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) vs Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support)

VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar

Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
30 kcal
Energy
368 kcal
6g
Sugars
3.5g
0g
Fat
17.5g
0g
Protein
15.8g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) and Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) is the clear winner. With 338 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) contains significantly more sugar (6g) compared to the milder Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar (3.51g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) or Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar?

It depends on your goals. VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) has 30 calories, while Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar has 368 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) vegan?

No, VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between VitaFusion Calcium + D3 (Bone & Teeth Support) and Mint Chocolate Chip Energy Bar?

There is a difference of 338 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.