Head-to-Head Analysis

Wafers with peanut butter vs Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wafers with peanut butter

Wafers with peanut butter

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy

Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
561 kcal
Energy
320 kcal
35.1g
Sugars
68g
33.3g
Fat
0g
7g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wafers with peanut butter and Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wafers with peanut butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 241 more calories per 100g than Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Wafers with peanut butter takes the lead with only 35.1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy contains 68g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wafers with peanut butter offers a protein boost with 7.02g per 100g, outperforming Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wafers with peanut butter or Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy?

It depends on your goals. Wafers with peanut butter has 561 calories, while Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy has 320 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wafers with peanut butter vegan?

No, Wafers with peanut butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wafers with peanut butter and Sour apple flavor soft & chewy ropes candy?

There is a difference of 241 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.